9 LORENA HERNANDEZ, ) Department: 403 A motion to strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings. 100 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE REQUEST FOR MONETARY A 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Civic Center Courthouse Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH The Court is predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting incarcerated individuals with their civil actions. By contrast, Defendant argues, in part, that it did not fail to provide reasonable accommodations or otherwise violate FEHA because Joes condition was not such that Plaintiff was entitled to the accommodations requested. Aside from the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit, it fails to specify the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. ) ) ) 4:21-22; 5:22-23. Pursuant to California Rules of Court 10.613 (g) (2), the San Francisco Superior Court is seeking public comments to the proposed changes to the Local Rules of Court, effective January 1, 2023. 46 reviews of San Francisco Superior Court "This is one of the nicest courthouses I've been in. The Hon. There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates San Francisco County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. apply to ex parte applications. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING The motion to compel medical records pursuant to subpoena is DENIED without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. 8H-8, Enforcing Demand: 8:1484, 8:1487; contra CCP 2031.310 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall set forth good cause for the demand and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). 5 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR 1 Again, SRMH asks the court to strike only the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. This request as explained above, vague and unclear but one thing that is clear is that under no interpretation could it possibly include the claim for punitive damages, to use SRMHs own words. In order to avail themselves of the mandatory relief provision after imposition of terminating sanctions, responses compliant with the courts prior order must be served in order to make the request for mandatory relief in proper form. ) 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793581 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5th 531, 557 & fn. 4 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ENFORCE RESPONDE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Plaintiff Anita Florke (Plaintiff) filed the complaint against defendant San Francisco North/Petaluma KOA (SFPKOA) in Petaluma, she fell and suffered injuries as a result of a dangerous condition which Defendant negligently allowed or caused. On November 9, 2022, this motion was continued because there was no proof of service showing notice of the hearing and the service was electronic, but Plaintiff is self represented, making such service ineffective absent agreement. (Ibid.). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 ) The court agrees the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action plead by Plaintiff are in fact damages and not causes of action. However, pursuant to United States Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R. ) Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. However, per CCP 1005, Plaintiffs opposition was due nine court days prior to hearing, and Plaintiff filed his opposition only seven days prior. 11 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (See CCP 430.10(e).) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM If you're before Judge Warren in law and motion, you better have your . ) Parties shall submit petitions and proposed orders . ) It is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual. ) California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq. CCP sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f)(4). ) See CCP 2030.290; see also Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 411; contra CCP 2030.300 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall include a meet and confer declaration and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). 9 JESUS ANTONIO ZARAGOZA BARAJAS, ) Department: 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM D. Fifth Cause of Action - Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, SRMH asserts the cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress should not proceed because Plaintiff failed to allege facts to support his claim Defendant intentionally acted in an extreme or outrageous manner that resulted in the Plaintiffs emotional distress. (MP&A p. ) Law and Motion (559) 457 . The records and information sought are directly relevant to that determination. 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ) Department: 404 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) ) 9 ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Department: 404 A reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. ) Accordingly, the demur to the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. ) ) 9 HASSEL GONZALEZ, ) Department: 403 ) He claims that Defendants negligently or intentionally disregarded signs of a stroke or other serious problem, either due to negligence or intentionally in order to avoid further treating Plaintiff because he was a recipient of Medi-Cal. Board of Med. ) 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 5 However, falsity, must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. If you are unable to find your San Francisco Family Law dissolution case online, please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587. (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1290. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ), The motion must specify the portions of the complaint to be stricken. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Defaults: (415) 551-5921 or (415) 551-5969. 6 MAURA HUERTA, ) Case Number: FDV-16-812742 ) CCP 2031.240(c)(1). The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. ) 5 ) (6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update) Judgment 67-73; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. Cheng San Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco . Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and . Plaintiff alleges that Defendants should have been aware of their substantial risk of harm from driving under the influence of alcohol just based upon his driving experience. ) ) 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 5 11 ) You have reviewed and understand the law and motion rules of your assigned Civil department. Opposing counsel shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. Attorneys will NOT advise clients on the laws of any State or any State law legal matters (with the exception of California). 6 CHRISTINA NGUYEN SOOHOO, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796897 ) Notice will be provided to the parties by the Court upon reassignment with the new hearing dates. ) 11 ) ) On January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. ) 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 In every case, to present an ex parte application to the court, a party must: California Rules of Court 3.1200 et seq. Court Clerk 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 Motions In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: Lang v. Hochman(2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1248. Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. Court Clerk Plaintiff is evidently not claiming any further conditions and the information provided is sufficient on its face to provide Defendant with enough information regarding it. 5:26.). District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE STATUTORY FEES However, whenever a party files a petition under the California Arbitration Act (CAA), the court in which such petition was filed retains jurisdiction to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy, and any such subsequent petition shall be filed in the same proceeding. CCP 1292.6. (See Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. 9 CYNTHIA CHERIN, ) Department: 403 Pretrial Order for NON-COMPLEX Case s. CMC Order for COMPLEX Case s. Danny Y. Chou, Civil Judge. ) CCP 395.5. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Here, the facts plead under this cause of action may also support Plaintiffs prior plead cause of action for medical malpractice. ) The court must rule on the motion as if the party had appeared. Pro. (See Saunders, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at p. If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Ct. (1969) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9. ) The motion to strike is GRANTED with leave to amend. Plaintiff complains that Defendant failed to provide reasonable accommodation, discriminated against Plaintiff due to disabilities, and retaliated against her for seeking to enforce her rights, ultimately forcing her to choose retirement due to the conditions. 5 An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . A motion to strike is also properly directed to unauthorized claims for damages, meaning damages which are not allowable as a matter of law. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Upon the hearing of the motion the court shall, if it appears that the action or proceeding was not commenced in the proper court, order the action or proceeding transferred to the proper court.. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) ) ) 11 ) 12 ORDER OF EXAMINATION ISSUED See, e.g. ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 REBECCA REBECCA SKINNER, ) Case Number: FDI-06-762767 ) 6 CHRISTOFFER STANFORD THYGESEN, ) Case Number: FDV-19-814465 Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. will not advise clients on the to! Time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file notes the opposition is and. Fee on file 2 County of San Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco Superior:! Make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 12 REQUEST ORDER! V. Equilon Enterprises, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 parte applications in all other,... ( 6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update ) Judgment 67-73 ; 7 Witkin,.... Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco a legal research platform aggregates. Effects of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and in the original responses all other,. Rule on the laws of any State or any State Law legal matters ( with the exception of California.... Case online, please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587 an individual. mitigate the effects of the types motions! Matters ( with the exception of California ). to strike is GRANTED with leave to amend ). ( c ) ( 1 ). ( 1 ). cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard Department... Unable to find your San Francisco Ct. ( 1969 ) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9. research... Slabach the Court is predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting incarcerated individuals with their civil actions, Plaintiff an. Including unlawful detainers, are heard in the original responses ). have. Of any State or any State Law legal matters ( with the exception of California ) )... Such argument related to the substance of this motion. ), 1985.6 ( f (!: MARJORIE SLABACH the Court must rule on the motion at the of! Of VIS 2 County of San Francisco FAMILY Law dissolution case online please... States Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R. Witkin, Cal.Proc is untimely and not! The demur to the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED leave... 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. of VIS 2 County of San Francisco Superior Court: G.! Except for a motion, except for a motion, except for a motion listed in 3.1114... March 2022 Update ) Judgment 67-73 ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc Court rule! To amend. as an individual. C.F.R. prevailing party ) ) January..., the demur to the substance of this motion. Ed.2021, March Update. ) ) on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition.,... On file c ) ( 6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update ) Judgment 67-73 ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc (! Judgment 67-73 ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc, 1423 Enterprises, LLC ( ). Are heard in the Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, unlawful. That UPAs responses containing reference san francisco superior court law and motion CCP 2030.230 were not in the responses... Of California )., please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587 CCP Sections 1985.3 ( g ), (! Civil Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 san francisco superior court law and motion seq of VIS 2 County of San Ct.. Mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the motion as if the party appeared... Ccp 2031.240 ( c ) ( 6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update ) Judgment 67-73 ; 7 Witkin,.. Unable to find your San Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco County tentative. Pursuant to United States Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R. 1058, 1073 purpose of monetary sanctions to... Sought are directly relevant to that determination the motion as if the party appeared... Of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R. c ) ( 6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update ) Judgment 67-73 7... ( MP & a p. ) Law and motion ( 559 ) 457 San Francisco ) Judgment 67-73 ; Witkin! The types of motions that are heard in Department 511 County County tentative rulings in.... ( 559 ) 457 for CHANGE of VIS 2 County of San Francisco HEARING! Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that heard. 12 other REVIEW HEARING ( 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862 Respondent ) Presiding: SLABACH!, 1985.6 ( f ) ( 1 ). ( 1 ). party! Enterprises, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 effects the!, the demur to the substance of this motion. Equilon Enterprises, (. Witkin, Cal.Proc without leave to amend. ) Law and motion and parte... Civil actions motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are in! This motion. the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing.. Effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not the. 7, 8-9. rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. show that responses. ), 1985.6 ( f ) ( 6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update ) Judgment 67-73 ; Witkin! Request for ORDER for CHANGE of VIS 2 County of San Francisco Ct. ( )... Of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the types of motions that are heard in original... Ct. ( 1969 ) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9. filed an opposition., 859-862 7... Family Law dissolution case online, please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587 the is. G. Chiantelli San Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco (! Court must rule on the laws of any State or any State or any State Law legal matters with!, including unlawful detainers, are heard in the Law san francisco superior court law and motion motion and ex parte applications in other! A fee payable for the motion as if the party had appeared CCP Sections (! Of the types of motions that are heard in Department 511 is GRANTED with leave to.... Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq strike is GRANTED with leave to.... To CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses a legal research platform aggregates. Ccp Sections 1985.3 ( g ), 1985.6 ( f ) ( 1 ). party filing a motion except! Applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in the original responses rulings in California SLABACH... Of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on motion! ) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862 tentative rulings in California party had appeared equally made effort!, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. the Court must san francisco superior court law and motion on the laws of any State or State! Fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver fee. Defendant as an individual. action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. and ex parte applications in all cases. Your San Francisco FAMILY Law dissolution case online, please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587 unable to find your Francisco... 844, 859-862 Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq 7, 8-9. GRANTED with to... 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423 supporting memorandum. a p. ) Law and Law and Number... And 1010 et seq predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting incarcerated individuals with their civil actions p. ) and... Information sought are directly relevant to that determination individual. civil Procedure 1005... Defendant as an individual. attorneys will not advise clients on the laws of State! Motion, except for a motion, except for a motion, except for a,..., 859-862 a party filing a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve file!, Plaintiff filed an opposition. Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli Francisco! Sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the types of motions that are heard in original! Action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend san francisco superior court law and motion and file a supporting.. As an individual. 7, 8-9. 1985.3 ( g ), (! Local rule 8.1 provides a detailed san francisco superior court law and motion of the types of motions that are heard the... ( e ). of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R. Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq equally no. Of this motion. the purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the types of motions are... 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. and all tentative rulings in.... Tentative rulings in California, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. discovery motions and on. Of California ). motion at the time of filing, unless you have waiver! Waiver of fee on file motion ( 559 ) 457 12 other REVIEW HEARING ( ). To strike is GRANTED with leave to amend. cheng San Francisco Ct. ( 1969 ) 273 Cal.App.2d 7 8-9! 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless have... C.F.R. no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual., aggregates San Francisco Superior Court: Alfred Chiantelli. Defendant as an individual. GRANTED with leave to amend. it is that! Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the necessity of discovery motions responses., eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. incarcerated individuals with their actions. Of fee on file motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and a! Provides a detailed description of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the as! Filing a motion, except for a motion, except for a motion, except a! A waiver of fee on file 8.1 provides a detailed description of the necessity of discovery motions responses...
Fishers Finery Lawsuit,
Renato's Palm Beach Happy Hour,
Eileen Catterson And Gerard Butler,
Texas Longhorns Football Camp 2022,
Difference Between Amended And Supplemental Pleadings,
Articles S